Why the study?
Developing prognostic models to direct COVID-19 patients to appropriate levels of care is crucial, and cardiac biomarkers may aid risk stratification despite lingering caveats.
Does the use of cardiac troponins and B-type natriuretic peptide provide prognostic value in COVID-19 patients?
Does the use of cardiac troponins and B-type natriuretic peptide provide prognostic value in COVID-19 patients?
Cardiac biomarkers like troponin and BNP show strong prognostic value in COVID-19, but their routine use for risk stratification remains debated in current guidelines.
May aid risk stratification in COVID-19 with cardiac injury; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still challenging health care systems worldwide. Over time, it has become clear that respiratory disease is not the only important entity as critically ill patients are also more prone to develop complications, such as acute cardiac injury. Despite extensive research, the mainstay of treatment still relies on supportive care and targeted therapy of these complications. The development of a prognostic model which helps clinicians to diverge patients to an appropriate level of care is thus crucial. As a result, several prognostic markers have been studied in the past few months. Among them are the cardiac biomarkers, especially cardiac troponins T/I and brain natriuretic peptide, which seem to have important prognostic values as several reports have confirmed their strong association with adverse clinical outcomes and death. The use of these biomarkers as part of a prognostic tool could potentially result in more precise risk stratification of COVID-19 patients and divergence to an adequate level of care. However, several caveats persist causing international guidelines to still recommend in favour of a more conservative approach to cardiac biomarker testing for prognostic purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zwaenepoel et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: