Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Having used critical reflection in teaching students about a critical social work approach, the writer explores the development of a critical reflection framework for thinking about evaluation. She identifies a range of possible criteria including: • seeing subjective histories and stories as valid sources of information and knowledge, • making sure the views of those least likely to be heard are included, • enabling participants to make connections between personal and broader structural issues, and • specific suggestions about evaluation processes such as paying attention to processes as well as outcomes. These criteria are used to critically consider the evaluation of two community-based projects - Shared Action, a community development approach to child safety and community building, and the Rural Access Project - a pilot project exploring the provision of education services about arthritis in rural communities. She concludes that such a framework could certainly help in raising issues for evaluators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiona Gardner (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: