Why the study?
Does varying radio-frequency pulse voltage and duration affect the volume of tissue injury in canine myocardium?
Does varying radio-frequency pulse voltage and duration affect the volume of tissue injury in canine myocardium?
In a canine model, radio-frequency ablation lesion size increases with voltage and pulse duration up to a plateau, beyond which higher energy delivery increases the risk of arcing and tissue vaporization.
Requires human validation before informing RF ablation protocols; leaves open optimal parameters for safe lesion creation.
The purpose of this investigation was to examine in vivo the relationship of radio-frequency (RF) pulse voltage and duration on the volume of tissue injury. RF 500-kHz pulses of 20-, 40-, and 60-V amplitude (RMS) were applied to the epicardium of 18 dogs for pulsing periods of 5-20 s. Systematic and quantitative tissue analysis was then performed after 30 days. No chronic lesions were evident on microscopic examination for 20-V RF pulse applications up to 15 s. Application of 20-V pulses for 20 s produced small lesions having a volume of 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm3. At 40 V, the volume of tissue injury ranged from 39.1 +/- 10.3 mm3 for 5 s of pulse application to 128.8 +/- 24.8 mm3 for 20 s of pulse application. Over the first 15 s of 40-V pulse application, the volume of tissue injury increased as pulse application time increased. There was no further increase in tissue injury for 40-V pulsing durations greater than 15 s. At 60 V, volumes of tissue injury ranged from 122.7 +/- 33.5 mm3 at 5 s to 313.6 +/- 73.7 mm3 at 20 s. Lesion size increased significantly for pulse durations of up to 10 s. Thereafter, 60-V pulses yielded little increase in tissue injury. In addition, persistent 60-V pulsing for periods greater than 9 s duration resulted in arcing and tissue vaporization in 28% of the applications. Thus RF energy is limited in its ability to create safe and effective tissue injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bardy et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: