Why the study?
Timely acquisition of a 12-lead ECG in the emergency department is recommended by guidelines, but the association of a medical history of coronary artery disease with door-to-ECG time required evaluation.
Does a medical history of coronary artery disease reduce door-to-ECG time in patients admitted to the emergency department for cardiac evaluation?
Does a medical history of coronary artery disease reduce door-to-ECG time in patients admitted to the emergency department for cardiac evaluation?
Patients with a known history of coronary artery disease experience shorter door-to-ECG times in the emergency department, suggesting a triage bias that delays timely ECG acquisition in patients without known CAD.
Background: Timely acquisition of 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) in the emergency department (ED) is crucial and recommended by current guidelines. Objectives: To evaluate the association of medical history of coronary artery disease (hCAD) on door-to-ECG time in the ED. Methods: In this single center, retrospective cohort study, patients admitted to ED for cardiac evaluation between were grouped according to hCAD, and no hCAD. The primary outcome was door-to-ECG time. A multivariate analysis adjusted for the cofounders sex, age, type of referral and shift was performed to evaluate the association of hCAD with door-to-ECG. Results: 1,101 patients were included in this analysis. 362 patients (33%) had hCAD. Patients with hCAD had shorter door-to-ECG time (20 min. [Inter Quartile Range [IQR] 13 – 30] vs. 22 min. [IQR 14 – 37]; p<0.001) when compared to patients with no hCAD. In a multivariable regression analysis hCAD was significantly associated with a shorter door-to-ECG time (- 3 min. [p=0.007; 95% confidence Interval [CI] -5.16 – -0.84 min.]). Conclusion: In this single center registry, hCAD was associated with shorter door-to-ECG time. In patients presenting in ED for cardiac evaluation, timely ECG diagnostic should be facilitated irrespective of hCAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heger et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: