Why the study?
Patients recovered from COVID-19 can experience persistent cardiac sequelae, making identification of medium- and long-term effects with CMR beneficial, yet consensus remains lacking due to limited and contradictory data.
Does CMR imaging detect signs of myocardial injury in patients recovered from COVID-19 compared to healthy controls?
Does CMR imaging detect signs of myocardial injury in patients recovered from COVID-19 compared to healthy controls?
CMR imaging can detect signs of myocardial injury in patients recovered from COVID-19, but consensus on the clinical implications of these findings is still lacking.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urges cardiac surveillance in COVID-19 survivors; leaves open the prevalence, mechanisms, and management of persistent myocardial injury.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization raised the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status to a pandemic level. The disease caused a global outbreak with devastating consequences, and a fair percentage of patients who have recovered from it continue experiencing persistent sequelae. Hence, identifying the medium and long-term effects of the COVID-19 disease is crucial for its future management. In particular, cardiac complications, from affected function to myocardial injuries, have been reported in these patients. Considering that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard in diagnosing myocardial involvement and has more advantages than other medical imaging modalities, assessing the outcomes of patients who recovered from COVID-19 with CMR could prove beneficial. This review compiles common findings in CMR in patients from the general population who recovered from COVID-19. The CMR-based techniques comprised parametric mapping for analyzing myocardial composition, feature tracking for studying regional heart deformation, and late gadolinium enhancement for detecting compromised areas in the cardiac muscle. A total of 19 studies were included. The evidence suggests that it is more likely to find signs of myocardial injury in patients who recovered from COVID-19 than in healthy controls, including changes in T1 and T2 mapping relaxation times, affected strain, or the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) lesions. However, more than two years after the outbreak, there is still a lack of consensus about how these parameters may indicate cardiac involvement in patients who recovered from the disease, as limited and contradictory data is available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mojica‐Pisciotti et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: