The reduction of a series of 3-W-1-methylquinolinium cations (1: W = H, Br, CONH 2 , CO 2 CH 3 , CN, NO 2 ) by 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide has been investigated. In all cases the kinetically controlled product from these reactions is the appropriate 3-W-1,4-dihydro-1-methylquinoline. Only for W = Br is any significant amount of the 1,2-dihydro isomer obtained (15% in this case). This kinetic preference for C-4 attack over C-2 attack in dihydronicotinamide reductions contrasts with the kinetically preferred attack at C-2 by hydroxide ion and in borohydride reductions. Rates of reduction were measured for each 1 and also 1,2-dimethyl- and 1,4-dimethylquinolinium cations in 20% CH 3 CN – 80% H 2 O, ionic strength 1.0 at 25 ° C, under pseudo-first-order conditions. Kinetic saturation due to nonproductive 1:1 complex formation was observed for several cations at high concentrations (> 0.1 M). Second-order rate constants [Formula: see text] were evaluated for each W, and also kinetic isotope effects from second-order rate constants [Formula: see text] for reduction by 1-benzyl-4,4-dideuterio-1,4-dihydronicotinamide. Second-order rate constants are correlated with σ p − for W with ρ = 4.5, and are also closely correlated with [Formula: see text] for pseudobase formation at C-4 of these quinolinium cations by: [Formula: see text]. Values of [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text] describe a Westheimer curve reaching a maximum of 5.8 for W = Br and falling to 1.5 for W = NO 2 and 4.2 for W = H. These data are consistent with an intrinsic barrier of 2.9 ± 0.5 kcal/mol for hydride transfer between this 1,4-dihydronicotinamide and quinolinium cations. However, quinolinium cations display a dramatically enhanced rate of dihydronicotinamide reduction relative to hydroxide ion attack when compared with isoquinolinium cations. This observation, and the predominance of C-4 rather than C-2 reduction, suggests that these reactions may not be simple one-step hydride transfer processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bunting et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: