Key result
Contrast-enhanced MRI detects coronary plaque uptake in ~45% of lesions, outperforming non-contrast imaging.
Observational (n=9)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: We sought to evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced coronary magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for selective visualization and non-invasive differentiation of atherosclerotic coronary plaque in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) as confirmed by X-ray angiography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) were studied by T1-weighted black blood inversion recovery coronary MRI before (N-IR) and after administration of Gd-DTPA (CE-IR). Plaques were categorized as calcified, non-calcified, and mixed based on their Hounsfield number derived from MDCT. With MDCT, a total of 29 plaques were identified, including calcified (n=6), non-calcified (n=6), and mixed calcified/non-calcified (n=17). On N-IR MRI, 26 plaques (90%) were dark, whereas three plaques (two non-calcified and one mixed) appeared bright. On CE-MRI, 13/29 (45%) plaques, 11 of which were mixed, one non-calcified, and one calcified showed contrast uptake. All others remained dark. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, we demonstrate the potential utility of CE-IR MRI for selective plaque visualization and differentiation of plaque types. The observed contrast uptake may be associated with endothelial dysfunction, neovascularization, inflammation, and/or fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Maintz (2006) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=9). Contrast-enhanced inversion recovery coronary MRI (CE-IR MRI) with Gd-DTPA vs. Non-contrast inversion recovery MRI (N-IR MRI) and MDCT was evaluated on Coronary plaque contrast uptake / hyperenhancement. Contrast-enhanced inversion recovery MRI detected contrast uptake in 45% (13/29) of MDCT-identified coronary plaques, compared to 10% (3/29) appearing bright on non-contrast MRI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: