Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A newly developed social anxiety scale for Venezuelan college students demonstrated satisfactory initial validity and reliability.
Objective: to develop and validate a scale of social anxiety in Venezuelan college students. Method: a set of items was prepared based on literature review and consultations with experts in the area. The analysis of items was carried out on a sample of 300 students; 20 reagents were selected according to statistical criteria. Then, validity and reliability studies were conducted in a sample of 408 students. Results: factorial analysis pointed out three significant factors (cognitive bias, malaise to observation and behavioral inhibition), which account for 44% of the variance. In the study of convergent validity, social anxiety is correlated with academic stress resulting from socialization (r =. 31) and fright (r =. 70). The internal consistency of the factors and the total scale was satisfactory. Appropriate test-retest reliability rates in a sample of 64 students were obtained. Conclusions: Although the scale shows good psychometric properties, it is recommended to obtain more convergent and divergent validity indicators, and through contrasting groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medina et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: