OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to examine the external validity of an FFQ designed to estimate dietary vitamin D intake compared with a plasma biomarker and three repeated 24 h dietary recalls in women of reproductive age in Serbia, where there is no exposure to food fortified with vitamin D. The method of triads was applied. DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, 422 women completed the Women and Reproductive Health FFQ (WRH-FFQ) during the winter months. From a representative subgroup (n 44), three 24 h dietary recalls and anthropometric parameters were collected as well as a fasting blood sample for vitamin D biomarker analyses. Correlation coefficients were calculated between each of the dietary methods. Validity coefficients, as a correlation between the measured and estimated 'true' exposure, were calculated using the method of triads. Bland-Altman plots were also constructed. SETTING: Three major universities in Serbia. SUBJECTS: Healthy young women (n 422) aged 18-35 years. RESULTS: The WRH-FFQ estimate of vitamin D intake for all participants was 4.0 (sd 3.3) µg/d and 3.1 (sd 2.3) µg/d for the subgroup. Bland-Altman plots for these intakes showed high agreement. Validity coefficients for the FFQ, 24 h recall and biomarker were ρ QI=0.847 (95% CI 0.564, 0.928), ρ RI=0.810 (95% CI 0.537, 0.997) and ρ BI=0.499 (95% CI 0.190, 0.840), while the correlation coefficients were 0.686, 0.422 and 0.404. CONCLUSIONS: The FFQ applied in the present study is a valid tool for assessing dietary vitamin D intake in women living in Serbia, a region without mandatory vitamin D food fortification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djekić-Ivanković et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: