There is a preconception among American archaeologists that the late Pleistocene ( c . 12,000-10,000 hap.) and early Holocene human occupation of the Americas would have had highly formalized and diagnostic technologies (Bryan 1986), as seen in bifacial fluted projectiles (Clovis and/or Folsom points) or Palaeoarctic microblades. This bias carries with it two presumptions which have no reason to exist: • Clovis and related industries had to be diffused throughout the Americas; and • there should be a ‘big-game hunting’ horizon in South America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Renato Kipnis (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: