Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The traditional, or classical, picture of M–CO bonding is not a good model for more than 200 metal carbonyl species with average ν(CO) values greater than 2143 cm−1. These “nonclassical” complexes, exemplified in this Perspective by the cations Cu(CO)n+ and Ag(CO)n+ (n = 1–4), possess M–CO interactions that are best described as M←CO σ bonds having a significant electrostatic component. There is relatively little M→CO π backbonding. However, despite the similarity in ν(CO) values, homologous Cu(CO)n+ and Ag(CO)n+ complexes behave differently when subjected to perturbations such as stretching the metal–carbon bonds or adding a pair of weak ligands to the metal center.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven H. Strauss (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: