Why the study?
Monoclonal antibody therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2 have been limited by viral sequence variability in emerging variants of concern and the requirement for high doses.
Does a multi-specific, multi-affinity antibody platform improve neutralization and protection against SARS-CoV-2 compared to monoclonal antibodies in preclinical models?
Does a multi-specific, multi-affinity antibody platform improve neutralization and protection against SARS-CoV-2 compared to monoclonal antibodies in preclinical models?
The Multabody platform leverages avidity and multi-specificity to provide potent neutralization and protection against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants at significantly lower doses than traditional monoclonal antibodies.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been responsible for a global pandemic. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used as antiviral therapeutics; however, these therapeutics have been limited in efficacy by viral sequence variability in emerging variants of concern (VOCs) and in deployment by the need for high doses. In this study, we leveraged the multi-specific, multi-affinity antibody (Multabody, MB) platform, derived from the human apoferritin protomer, to enable the multimerization of antibody fragments. MBs were shown to be highly potent, neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 at lower concentrations than their corresponding mAb counterparts. In mice infected with SARS-CoV-2, a tri-specific MB targeting three regions within the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain was protective at a 30-fold lower dose than a cocktail of the corresponding mAbs. Furthermore, we showed in vitro that mono-specific MBs potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 VOCs by leveraging augmented avidity, even when corresponding mAbs lose their ability to neutralize potently, and that tri-specific MBs expanded the neutralization breadth beyond SARS-CoV-2 to other sarbecoviruses. Our work demonstrates how avidity and multi-specificity combined can be leveraged to confer protection and resilience against viral diversity that exceeds that of traditional monoclonal antibody therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aschner et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: