This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
As exposed bedrocks commonly interface with the soil directly, lacking a transition layer, cracks at rock–soil interface cracks (RSI-Cracks), are well-developed, particularly following wet–dry alternation in karst critical zones. However, inadequate understanding of the influence of RSI-Cracks on multi-path runoff generation around bedrocks has hindered an in-depth comprehension of subsurface-dominated hydrological processes in karst areas. To address this gap, we developed micro-slope models replicating rock–soil interfacial configurations by building upon field investigations. Two conditions, namely, the presence and absence of RSI-Cracks, were incorporated, with rain intensity and rock surface inclination as experimental conditions. Our results indicate that RSI-Cracks significantly alter the runoff output (p < 0.05), exacerbating subsurface water leakage. Compared with that on slopes without RSI-Cracks, the proportion of surface runoff on slopes with RSI-Cracks is reduced, with a reduction range of 4 to 46%. Conversely, RSI-Cracks promote an increase in the proportion of outflow at the rock–soil interface (RSI flow), with an increase range of 7 to 38%. This is an important reason for the aggravation of subsurface water leakage through RSI-Cracks. However, there is no significant change in the water loss caused by internal soil seepage on slopes with or without RSI-Cracks. These findings provide novel insights into underground water loss, with valuable implications for the construction and improvement of hydrological models in karst areas.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: