Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fire safety in high-rise residential buildings depends on active fire protection systems subject to technical, human, and organisational risks. Prior probabilistic models incorporating human and organisational errors (HOEs) raise expected risk-to-life by 20 to 37%, yet remain inaccessible to the owners, managers, qualified persons, and regulators who must act on them. This paper applies SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to a reconstructed Bayesian network fire risk model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation, extending the T-H-O-Risk methodology across sixteen system configurations and seven buildings in five jurisdictions (Singapore, Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, the UK) plus a generic reference case. Global SHAP analysis attributes 89.8% of total HOE attribution to maintenance-related factors (H7, insufficient technical handover; H8, insufficient safety check; H9, inadequate periodic inspection), reframing the primary intervention from behavioural to structural. The reconstruction reproduces 112 published ERL values with a mean absolute percentage error of 1.8% on total ERL (13.7% on the HOE increment, the layer carrying the paper’s claims) and 96% interval coverage. Attribution outputs are translated into graded, risk-informed maintenance conditions for SCDF waiver assessment. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first Shapley values attribution of HOE factors in a building system-level Bayesian network fire risk model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: