Drawing on fieldwork conducted in a clinical setting in China, this article makes a contribution to the special issue’s examination of the ambiguity of kinship’s mutuality by engaging systemic family therapy. Family therapists are no strangers to the negative in family life. ‘We-ness’ could be a suffocating embrace and potentially the nourishing condition for even the most severe of psychiatric diagnoses. While practitioners understand the purpose of treatment in terms ‘individuation’, I argue for seeing family therapy as a technology of kin therapeutics for working on relational tangles that have caused someone to take responsibility for something she or he cannot control. While systemic therapy may appear to valorise a self-determined, rational subject, I highlight instead what practitioners themselves know all too well – that human lives are interconnected, and I underscore the existential import of their concern for the entangled adolescent therapeutic action works to set ‘free’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teresa Kuan (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: