Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: To examine the Healthy Fitness Zone (pass/fail) criterion-referenced reliability (CRR) and equivalency (CRE) of the 1-mile run/walk (MRW) and Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run (PACER) in adolescents (13 to 18 years). Methods: Seventy-six girls and 165 boys were randomly assigned to complete 2 trials of each test. Results: CRR for the boys on the MRW ( Pa = 77%, κ q = 0.53) was lower than on the PACER ( Pa = 81%, κ q = 0.63); girls were classified more similarly on the MRW ( Pa = 83%, κ q = 0.67) than on the PACER ( Pa = 79%, κ q = 0.58). The CRE between the MRW and PACER indicated boys ( Pa = 77%, κ q = 0.55) were classified more consistently on both tests than girls ( Pa = 73%, κ q = 0.46). Conclusions: No test provided greater consistency. Practitioners may consider other features, such as ease of administration, environmental conditions, and comparative use in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beets et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: