A two-step, photocatalytic water splitting system consisting of Pt-loaded TaON (a H(2) evolution photocatalyst), Pt-loaded WO(3) (an O(2) evolution photocatalyst), and an iodate-iodide (IO(3)(-)/I(-)) shuttle redox mediator is investigated under visible light irradiation. Photocatalytic oxidation of water to O(2) and reduction of IO(3)(-) to I(-) proceeded with good selectivity over the Pt-WO(3) photocatalyst, even in the presence of a considerable amount of I(-) anions in the solution. The key difference between the adsorption properties of IO(3)(-) and I(-) anions on WO(3) strongly suggested that the photoexcited electrons could react efficiently with IO(3)(-) adsorbed on WO(3), whereas the photogenerated holes selectively reacted with water molecules owing to the low adsorptivity of I(-) on WO(3). Photocatalytic H(2) evolution on Pt-TaON proceeded efficiently, accompanied by I(-) oxidation to IO(3)(-) due to a substantial amount of adsorption of I(-) anions on the surface, whereas H(2) evolution was significantly inhibited by the competitive adsorption of IO(3)(-), which consumes photoexcited electrons. It was also found that WO(3) photocatalysts loaded with platinum oxide (PtO) showed a much higher activity for O(2) evolution in the presence of the electron acceptor IO(3)(-), compared to those loaded with Pt metal. Overall water splitting at a steady rate was demonstrated using a combination of Pt-TaON and Pt(PtO)-WO(3) in an aqueous NaI solution with neutral or weakly acidic pH values, where the concentration of NaI significantly affected the efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abe et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: