This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Fungi are capable of nitrification and denitrification and often dominate the microbial biomass of temperate grassland soils. We determined the contributions of bacteria and fungi to N 2 O and N 2 production in a grassland soil from Northern Ireland by combining the substrate‐induced respiration inhibition method and the 15 N gas‐flux method. Streptomycin (C 21 H 39 N 7 O 12 ) was used as the bacterial inhibitor and cycloheximide (C 15 H 23 NO 4 ) as the fungal inhibitor. By labeling the NH 4 and NO 3 pools, we tested the hypothesis that fungi produce N 2 O and N 2 solely by the reduction of NO 3 Cycloheximide decreased the flux of N 2 O by 89% and streptomycin decreased the flux by 23%, indicating that fungi were responsible for most of the N 2 O production. All of the N 2 O was derived from NO 3 reduction. Labeled N 2 was only detected in control and streptomycin treatments. The distribution of the 15 N atoms in the labeled N 2 indicated that the source of the labeling was predominantly the NO 3 pool, but that the process of formation was not dominated by denitrification. Codenitrification, where a 15 N atom from labeled nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) combines with a 14 N atom from a natural abundance source, was proposed as the process forming labeled N 2 About 92% of the labeled N 2 was estimated to be due to codenitrification and 8% due to denitrification. The flux of N 2 O was always greater than the flux of N 2 , the mole fraction of N 2 O averaging 0.7. Fungal denitrification could be of ecological significance because N 2 O is the dominant gaseous end product.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laughlin et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: