Why the study?
Warfarin dosing is challenging in children due to factors affecting pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, prompting the development and evaluation of a novel personalised dosing algorithm compared to conventional weight-based dosing.
Does a personalised warfarin dosing algorithm incorporating PK/PD and genotype information improve INR control compared to conventional weight-based dosing in children post-cardiac surgery?
Does a personalised warfarin dosing algorithm incorporating PK/PD and genotype information improve INR control compared to conventional weight-based dosing in children post-cardiac surgery?
A personalized PK/PD and genotype-based warfarin dosing algorithm may improve initial anticoagulation stabilization in warfarin-naïve children, but did not significantly improve time in therapeutic range in those already on maintenance therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Model-based dosing may improve anticoagulation control in children post-cardiac surgery; leaves open whether it should replace weight-based regimens pending RCTs.
Warfarin dosing is challenging due to a multitude of factors affecting its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). A novel personalised dosing algorithm predicated on a warfarin PK/PD model and incorporating CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype information has been developed for children. The present prospective, observational study aimed to compare the model with conventional weight-based dosing. The study involved two groups of children post-cardiac surgery: Group 1 were warfarin naïve, in whom loading and maintenance doses were estimated using the model over a 6-month duration and compared to historical case-matched controls. Group 2 were already established on maintenance therapy and randomised into a crossover study comparing the model with conventional maintenance dosing, over a 12-month period. Five patients enrolled in Group 1. Compared to the control group, the median time to achieve the first therapeutic INR was longer (5 vs. 2 days), to stable anticoagulation was shorter (29.0 vs. 96.5 days), to over-anticoagulation was longer (15.0 vs. 4.0 days). In addition, median percentage of INRs within the target range (%ITR) and percentage of time in therapeutic range (%TTR) was higher; 70% versus 47.4% and 83.4% versus 62.3%, respectively. Group 2 included 26 patients. No significant differences in INR control were found between model and conventional dosing phases; mean %ITR was 68.82% versus 67.9% (p = 0.84) and mean %TTR was 85.47% versus 80.2% (p = 0.09), respectively. The results suggest model-based dosing can improve anticoagulation control, particularly when initiating and stabilising warfarin dosing. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Metwali et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: