This paper presents the psychometric properties of a questionnaire measure that updates and extends Larrivee and Cook's (1979 LarriveeB., & CookL. (1979). Mainstreaming: A study of the variables affecting teacher attitude. Journal of Special Education, 13(3), 315–324.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) Opinions Relative to Mainstreaming Scale in terms of structure, terminology, and language. The revised scale was tested using a sample of 106 teachers based in inclusive mainstream schools. Using Principal Component Analysis, a four-factor structure was found for the “attitudes toward inclusion” section of the revised scale: (a) problems of inclusion of special educational needs (SEN) children in mainstream classes; (b) social benefits for all of the inclusion of SEN pupils in mainstream classes; (c) implications of inclusion for teaching practice; and (d) implications for addressing the needs of children with SEN. Moderate to good reliability was found for these components (Cronbach's α: .76–.86). In conclusion, the updated and revised Teachers' Attitude to Inclusion Scale (TAIS) shows promise of being a reliable and valid measure for both research and applied purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monsen et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: