Why the study?
Carotid artery intima-media thickness indicates cardiovascular disease risk, but automated measurement requires intima media complex segmentation, and traditional methods using shape, color, and texture show poor generalization.
Does an end-to-end auto encoder-decoder model improve the accuracy of carotid intima-media thickness measurement compared to a pipeline CNN model?
Does an end-to-end auto encoder-decoder model improve the accuracy of carotid intima-media thickness measurement compared to a pipeline CNN model?
An end-to-end auto encoder-decoder deep learning model provides more accurate automated measurements of carotid intima-media thickness compared to a pipeline CNN model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CNN-based IMC segmentation may aid automated IMT measurement; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Intima Media Thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery is an important marker indicating the sign of cardiovascular disease. Automated measurement of IMT requires segmentation of intima media complex (IMC).Traditional methods which use shape, color and texture for classification have poor generalization capability. This paper proposes two models- the pipeline model and the end-to-end model using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and auto encoder–decoder network respectively. CNN architecture is implemented and tested by varying the number of convolutional layer, size of the kernel as well as the number of kernels. Auto encoder–decoder performs pixel wise classification using two interconnected pathways for identifying the boundary of lumen-intima (LI) and media adventitia (MA). This helps in reconstruction of the segmented portion for measurement of IMT. Both methods are tested using a dataset of 550 subjects. The results clearly indicate that end-to-end model has an edge over the pipeline model exhibiting lesser deviation between the automated measurement and the measurement made by the radiologist. The pipeline model however has better segmentation accuracy when the size of the image used for training is small. The convolutional neural network with auto encoder–decoder proves robust through sparse representation, and faster learning with better generalization. Also, the experimental setup is analyzed by interconnecting Tensor flow simulated result with Raspberry PI and the outcomes are analyzed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subramaniam et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: