Key result
Intermittent and on-demand very low calorie diets yield similar 2-year weight loss.
RCT (n=334)
Randomized
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To compare two different very low calorie diet (VLCD)-based weight maintenance strategies. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized 2-year clinical trial performed at the Department of Body Composition and Metabolism, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A total of 334 patients, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg m-2, aged 18-60 years. INTERVENTIONS: All the patients started with 16 VLCD weeks. Subjects in the intermittent group were then scheduled to use VLCD for 2 weeks every third month, whilst patients in the on-demand group were instructed to use VLCD whenever their body weight passed an individualized cut-off level. Irrespective of the treatment group, all the subjects were recommended a hypocaloric diet during VLCD-free periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in body weight, body composition, anthropometric variables and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Completers in both groups maintained highly significant weight losses after 2 years: 7.0 +/- 11.0 kg (6.2 +/- 9.5%) in the intermittent group and 9.1 +/- 9.7 kg (7.7 +/- 8.1%) in the on-demand group (P < 0.001, ns between groups). Male completers in the on-demand group lost significantly more weight than men in the intermittent group, 14.5 +/- 11.0 kg vs. 4.0 +/- 10.5 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). Most cardiovascular risk factors improved during the first year, whilst anthropometric measures, insulin, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol were also significantly improved after 2 years of treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant weight reductions were achieved after 2 years of VLCD-based treatment. The structure of VLCD treatment during the maintenance phase did not affect weight loss in the total study population, whilst male subjects might benefit from the VLCD on-demand strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lantz et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Obesity (n=334). Intermittent very low calorie diet (VLCD) vs. On-demand VLCD (used whenever body weight passed an individualized cut-off level) was evaluated on Changes in body weight, body composition, anthropometric variables and cardiovascular risk factors (p=ns between groups). Intermittent and on-demand very low calorie diet maintenance resulted in similar 2-year weight losses (6.2% vs. 7.7%; P=ns between groups), though men lost more weight with on-demand use (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: