Why the study?
Does a remote monitoring heart failure disease management program affect emergency room visits and hospital readmissions in heart failure patients?
Does a remote monitoring heart failure disease management program affect emergency room visits and hospital readmissions in heart failure patients?
Caregiver support is a critical structural component of remote monitoring programs for heart failure and may influence nurses' decision-making to mitigate hospital utilization.
May guide ER use in home HF monitoring; leaves open efficacy in prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE: Using an integrated model, the Donabedian Quality and Logic Model, we examined a remote monitoring heart failure disease management program. METHOD: This quantitative research used post-test only case matched design. The sample consisted of 210 participants from 23 home health care agencies. RESULTS: (3, n = 210) = 29.984, P = 0.012. The DTreg suggested that participants who were advised to go to the ER had a 1.00 probability of doing so, and those who were instructed otherwise had a 0.37 probability of going to the ER. Among participants who experienced a hospital readmission, there was 0.50 probability that patient education or other clinical intervention was implemented prior to the admission. CONCLUSION: As home health care agencies consider disease management programs, it is important to gain a comprehensive understanding of the potential of innovative programs and the resources they require. While the agency invested the resources required by the remote monitoring program, the study demonstrated that caregiver support was a critical structural component of the program and may affect change in nurses' decision making to mitigate hospital utilization. We recommend that home health care agencies take greater consideration of the family and social support in implementing a remote monitoring system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: