Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Horse spleen apoferritin catalyses the oxidation of Fe(2+) to Fe(3+) with molecular O(2) as electron acceptor under conditions where a number of other proteins have no such effect. The product is similar to ferritin by a number of criteria. 2. The progress curve is hyperbolic and the increase in initial velocity is linear with increasing apoferritin concentration. With respect to Fe(2+) the reaction follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The pH-dependence of the reaction was determined between pH4.3 and 6.0. 3. Modification of both tryptophan residues/apoferritin subunit with 2-nitrophenylsulphenyl chloride does not affect either k(cat.) or K(m) for the oxidation. Neither does the guanidination of seven out of nine lysine residues/subunit, the modification of nine out of ten arginine residues/subunit with cyclohexanedione, or the nitration of one out of five tyrosine residues/subunit with tetranitromethane. 4. The carboxymethylation of two out of three cysteine residues/subunit and of one out of six histidine residues/subunit can be achieved with iodoacetic acid. This carboxymethylated apoferritin is completely inactive in Fe(2+) oxidation. 5. Apoferritin does not take up Fe(3+). It appears from these results that Fe(2+) is the form in which iron is taken up by ferritin in a reaction where the protein acts as an enzyme which traps the product in the interior of the protein shell.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bryce et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: