Why the study?
Does continued rt-PA administration improve residual stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction after initially successful recanalization?
Does continued rt-PA administration improve residual stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction after initially successful recanalization?
Continued rt-PA administration after initially successful recanalization in acute myocardial infarction significantly reduces plaque area compared to placebo.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports continued rt-PA after successful recanalization to reduce plaque in AMI; extends evidence for prolonged thrombolysis beyond initial reperfusion.
Quantitative angiography was performed in 68 out of 123 patients treated with intravenous rt-PA for acute myocardial infarction. At 90 min angiography, the median minimal cross-sectional area was 1.11 mm2 and the median percentage area stenosis was 80%. A percentage area stenosis greater than 70% was seen in 78% of the patients. Patients with a patient infarct related artery at the first angiogram were randomized to receive subsequent infusions either of rt-PA + heparin or placebo + heparin. There was a persistent trend of improvement in minimal lumen diameter and percentage diameter stenosis of the residual stenosis in the infarct related artery in both treatment groups when re-examined 6-24 hours later and at the time of hospital discharge. A reduction in 'plaque area', the area between the detected and the reference contours of the infarct related segment, was more frequently seen in patients receiving a second infusion of rt-PA than in patients with no prolonged thrombolytic therapy (83% versus 57%, P less than 0.025, chi square).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serruys et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: