Key result
Oral estrogen increases APC resistance compared to placebo and transdermal therapy, which shows no effect.
RCT (n=196)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
OBJECTIVE: Activated protein C (APC) resistance not related to the factor V Leiden mutation is a risk factor for venous thrombosis. Oral estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has been reported to induce APC resistance. Little is known about the effect of transdermal estrogen. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 196 postmenopausal women who were randomly allocated to receive either 1 mg 17beta-estradiol orally (n=63) or 50 microg 17beta-estradiol transdermally per day (n=68), both associated with 100 mg progesterone daily or placebo (n=65) for 6 months. An activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based test and the effect of APC on thrombin potential (ETP) were used. Oral ERT induced an ETP-based APC resistance compared with both placebo (P=0.006) and transdermal ERT (P<0.001), but there was no significant effect of transdermal ERT compared with placebo (P=0.191). There was no significant effect of ERT on the APTT-based APC sensitivity ratio. Prothrombin fragment 1+2 plasma levels were significantly higher after 6 months of treatment in women allocated to oral ERT compared with those on placebo and transdermal ERT and were positively and significantly correlated with changes in ETP-based APC sensitivity ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that oral, unlike transdermal, estrogen induces APC resistance and activates blood coagulation. These results emphasize the importance of the route of estrogen administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oger et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Postmenopausal women (n=196). Oral or transdermal 17beta-estradiol plus progesterone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based activated protein C (APC) resistance (p=<0.001). Oral estrogen replacement therapy induced ETP-based APC resistance compared with placebo (P=0.006) and transdermal estrogen (P<0.001), whereas transdermal estrogen had no significant effect (P=0.191).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: