PURPOSE: To evaluate the intersession repeatability of the Colour Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) test and a novel 14-Hz flicker test in a population of healthy participants to provide benchmark data for their use as functional biomarkers for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Visual function was assessed using both techniques in 30 healthy adults (mean [standard deviation] age 36.3 [14.1] years) on two separate days. Intersession repeatability of RG and YB CAD thresholds and 14-Hz flicker thresholds was assessed by determining their coefficient of repeatability (CoR). RESULTS: The CoR was calculated to be 0.39 CAD units (17.0%) for RG thresholds, 0.43 CAD units (31.1%) for YB thresholds, and 0.015 (53.4%) for 14-Hz flicker contrast thresholds. On average, thresholds improved by 4.72% (RG), 6.33% (YB), and 13.3% (14-Hz flicker) between visits 1 and 2, suggesting a small but consistent learning effect. The CoR for all parameters was relatively small compared to the mean thresholds obtained (RG: mean 2.27 [4.58], CoR 0.39; YB: mean 1.37 [0.55], CoR 0.43; 14-Hz flicker: mean 0.028 [0.01], CoR 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This study has described the repeatability of the CAD and 14-Hz flicker tests. These data can help clinicians decide if the results from repeated measures are of clinical significance. Despite pretest training, there was some evidence of a learning effect. Therefore, clinical trials using these techniques should ensure training is sufficient to minimize these effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKeague et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: