Why the study?
Does short-term acclimatization at high altitude affect sleep efficacy and cardiovascular/ventilatory responses in healthy lowlander men?
Does short-term acclimatization at high altitude affect sleep efficacy and cardiovascular/ventilatory responses in healthy lowlander men?
Short-term high altitude exposure impairs sleep efficacy in healthy men, likely driven by hypoxia-induced cardiovascular and ventilatory changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short-term acclimatization may improve sleep at 3776 m via CV/ventilatory adaptations; leaves open generalizability beyond small healthy cohorts.
Horiuchi, Masahiro, Shiro Oda, Tadashi Uno, Junko Endo, Yoko Handa, and Yoshiyuki Fukuoka. Effects of short-term acclimatization at the summit of Mt. Fuji (3776 m) on sleep efficacy, cardiovascular responses, and ventilatory responses. High Alt Med Biol. 18:171–178, 2017.—We investigated the effects of a short period of acclimatization, at 3776 m on Mt. Fuji, on sleep parameters and related physiological responses. Physiological responses were assessed in seven healthy lowlander men during both daytime and sleep while at sea level (SL), as well as for three consecutive nights at high altitude (HA; 3776 m, day 1 [D1], D2, D3, and morning only of D4). Blood pressure variables, heart rate (HR), pulmonary ventilation (VE), and breathing frequency (Bf) progressively increased each day, with significant differences between SL and HA (p < 0.05, respectively). In contrast, end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) progressively decreased each day with statistical differences between SL and D3 at HA (p < 0.05). During sleep at HA, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was stable, whereas it decreased during sleep at SL. Sleep efficacy, which was assessed by actigraphy, was linearly impaired with statistical differences between SL and D3 (p < 0.05). These impairments in sleep efficacy at HA were associated with higher MAP and HR, as well as lower Bf and PETCO2 during the daytime (pooled data, p < 0.05, respectively). These results suggest that hypoxia-induced cardiovascular and ventilatory responses may be crucial contributors to changes in sleep efficacy at HA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horiuchi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: