Why the study?
Does indirect fracture reduction and fixation with the ASIF 95° blade plate improve union rates and reduce complications in patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures?
Does indirect fracture reduction and fixation with the ASIF 95° blade plate improve union rates and reduce complications in patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures?
Indirect fracture reduction using the ASIF 95° blade plate without medial bone grafting is recommended for treating subtrochanteric femoral fractures to achieve high union rates and minimal complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports indirect reduction with 95° blade plate for subtrochanteric fractures; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
The difficulty in treating subtrochanteric fractures is evidenced by the many modalities and techniques currently described in the orthopaedic literature. Rotational problems, shortening, implant failure, and high rates of delayed union or nonunion have been reported with the majority of the implants available today. We recommend a technique that uses indirect fracture reduction to achieve optimum axial alignment and length without aiming to achieve an anatomic reduction. Fixation is accomplished with the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (ASIF) 95° (condylar) blade plate. Medial bone grafting is not performed, and strict attention is paid toward avoiding unnecessary soft-tissue stripping or bone devascularization. An axial load is applied to the fracture by tensioning of the plate intraoperatively. The use of this technique results in an excellent rate of union, good control of rotation and length, and minimal complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marchesi et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: