Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2008Clinical Medicine Insights Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary MedicineOpen Access

Evaluation and Management of Syncope

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Patients presenting with syncope

Design

Review

Authors

PBPaveljit S. BindraFMFrancis E. MarchlinskiDLDavid Lin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports methodical syncope evaluation with EF assessment; leaves open prospective validation of ICD thresholds.

Key Points

  • To review evolving evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing syncope in a clinically and cost-effective manner.
  • Searched the Medline database from January 1996 to April 2006 using MeSH terms related to syncope, diagnostic imaging, and cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Reviewed English-language trials, reference bibliographies, and practice guidelines published by the Heart Rhythm Society, American Heart Association, and American College of Cardiology.
  • A standard initial evaluation combining clinical history, physical examination, and a 12-lead electrocardiogram accurately identifies the majority of high-risk patients.
  • Ventricular arrhythmias represent the primary etiology in patients with structural heart disease, and an ejection fraction below 30% indicates the need for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
  • Patients lacking structural heart disease generally exhibit low mortality risk and can be managed conservatively for neurocardiogenic syncope once inherited arrhythmogenic conditions are excluded.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients presenting with syncope
I
Intervention
Methodical diagnostic and management approach (including history, physical exam, ECG, echocardiogram, and targeted therapies like ICDs)
O
Outcome
Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of syncope

A methodical approach to syncope evaluation, centered on history, physical exam, ECG, and assessment of structural heart disease, is essential for effective management and risk stratification.

Cite This Study

Bindra et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a714e83a528af2d65c4039chttps://doi.org/10.4137/ccrpm.s490
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Syncope: Current Diagnostic Evaluation and Management1990 · 214 citations
  2. 2Syncope and the heart: When to suspect and how to act?2026
  3. 3Evaluation and management of the patient with syncope1992 · 37 citations
  4. 4Evaluation and Management of the Patient With Syncope1992 · 229 citations
  5. 5The evaluation and management of patients with syncope: Case report and overview of 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines2018