A 14-item, 3-factor structure of the CES-D is valid and gender-invariant in cardiac rehabilitation patients, though alternative scales may be preferable due to psychometric shortcomings.
CES-D factor structure is gender-invariant in cardiac rehabilitation; extends validation to this population but should not yet alter screening practice.
In Brief PURPOSE: To find a best-fitting factor structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) and test whether this structure is invariant across gender in a cardiac rehabilitation population. METHODS: We examined the data from 920 participants of a cardiac rehabilitation exercise program. Fourteen confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine existing factor solutions from the literature. The best-fitting model was tested for invariance across gender. RESULTS: The data fit best to a 3-factor solution, which has 14 items and 3 factors (ie, somatic symptoms, negative affect, and anhedonia). The goodness-of-fit indices showed an acceptable fit. The invariance analysis revealed that the factor structure is equivalent across gender. CONCLUSIONS: While a fitting factor solution was found, rehabilitation practitioners and researchers need to be aware of the psychometrical shortcomings of the CES-D and consider using other scales as alternative measures of depressive symptoms. This study examined an appropriate factor structure for the CES-D and tested for gender invariance in cardiac rehabilitation participants. Fourteen confirmatory factor analyses revealed a best-fitting 3-factor, 14-item structure. Gender invariance was confirmed for the model. However, practitioners and researchers need to be aware of the psychometrical shortcomings of the scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harenberg et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: