Markus Fischer characterizes his recent article in this journal as an “empirical contribution” to the debate among neorealist scholars and those whom, ignoring the diversity of their research interests and theoretical perspectives, he subsumes under the rubric of “critical theorists.” Fischer's piece requires a response because of (1) its tendentious reading of the work of other students of international relations theory and (2) its misuse of history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: