Why the study?
Does a minimally invasive approach with pericardial drainage and esophageal stenting effectively treat esophagopericardial fistulas after atrial fibrillation ablation?
Does a minimally invasive approach with pericardial drainage and esophageal stenting effectively treat esophagopericardial fistulas after atrial fibrillation ablation?
An early minimally invasive approach with pericardial drainage and esophageal stenting may be an effective alternative to surgery for esophagopericardial fistulas post-AF ablation, though esophageal stenosis is a potential complication.
May support stenting for select post-AF ablation fistulas; leaves open safety and durability in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforations are a rare but devastating complication of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Rapid treatment is crucial to avoid permanent disabilities and death. Surgical treatment is considered the treatment of choice. Alternatively, single case reports describe successful esophageal stenting, but others discourage this approach because of fatal consequences. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present 3 patients who developed esophagopericardial fistulas after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Diagnosis and management with pericardial drainage and esophageal stenting, as well as long-term follow-up are described. Esophagopericardial fistulas occurred 26, 9, and 18 days after the ablation procedure. Symptoms leading to admission were recurrence of atrial fibrillation (n=1), elective control endoscopy for thermal lesion (n=1), and pain with swallowing (n=1). Computed tomography revealed esophagopericardial fistulas with pericardial effusion in all patients, while contrast leakage and air in the left atrium could be excluded. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initialized, and minimally invasive pericardial drainage and esophageal stenting were performed. Stent dislocation occurred in 2 patients and was resolved by repositioning and clipping of the proximal stent end. After 45, 22, and 28 days, respectively, fistulas appeared closed and stents were removed. During follow-up, no embolic or septic events occurred. However, 2 patients underwent dilation of symptomatic esophageal stenosis in the formerly stented region. CONCLUSIONS: An early minimally invasive approach consisting of pericardial drainage and esophageal stenting proved effective in treating patients with esophagopericardial fistulas. However, constant interdisciplinary communication and attention is needed to recognize and manage potential evolving complications promptly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eitel et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: