This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The upper reaches of the Hanjiang River, China To enhance the accuracy and physical consistency of reservoir inflow forecasting, this study proposes a hybrid modeling framework that couples an enhanced Muskingum model with a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) network. The Muskingum model was restructured via differentiable programming to allow dynamic calibration of physical parameters across river sub-reaches. This physics-based layer was embedded within the BiLSTM network to learn the relationship between meteorological forcing inputs and runoff dynamics. Bayesian Optimization (BO) was adopted to co-optimize the Muskingum parameters and neural network hyperparameters, mitigating error propagation and thus enhancing predictive robustness. The proposed framework was evaluated on a reach of the upper Hanjiang River between Ankang and Danjiangkou Reservoirs. Results showed that model performance initially improved with finer segmentation, peaking with a four-segment configuration, after which performance declined—likely due to over-parameterization. The optimal four-segment hybrid model achieved a Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.94 during the test period, representing a 4.4 % improvement over both the pure BiLSTM model and the one-way coupled model. In addition, it achieved a Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) of 0.95 and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 598 m³ /s, exhibiting more stable predictive behavior. This further demonstrates the framework’s capability for accurate runoff characterization and high-precision inflow forecasting in complex reservoir systems. • Differentiable BO-Muskingum–BiLSTM framework unifies physical routing and learning. • Bayesian optimization co-calibrates routing parameters and BiLSTM settings. • Four-segment hybrid model improves NSE, RMSE, and KGE in the upper Hanjiang Basin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: