We study splitting methods for solving the Eigenvalue Complementarity Problem (EiCP). We introduce four variants, which depend on the properties (symmetry, nonsymmetry, positive definite, negative definite, indefinite) of the matrices included in the definition of EiCP. Convergence analyses for each one of these versions of the splitting method are discussed. Special choices for the splitting matrices associated with these versions are recommended and tested on the solution of small and large symmetric and nonsymmetric EiCPs. These experiments show that the four versions of the splitting method work well at least for some choices of the splitting matrices. Furthermore, these versions of the splitting methods seem to be competitive with the most efficient state-of-the-art algorithms for the solution of EiCP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iusem et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: