Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background 1.5-mile run time, as a surrogate measure of aerobic fitness, is associated with musculoskeletal injury (MSI) risk in military recruits. This study aimed to determine if 1.5-mile run times can predict injury risk and attrition rates from phase 1 (initial) training and determine if a link exists between phase 1 and 2 discharge outcomes in British Army recruits. Method 1.5-mile times from week 1 of initial training and MSI reported during training were retrieved for 3446 male recruits. Run times were examined against injury occurrence and training outcomes for 3050 recruits, using a Binary Logistic Regression and χ 2 analysis. Results The 1.5-mile run can predict injury risk and phase 1 attrition rates (χ 2 (1)=59.3 p<0.001, χ 2 (1)=66.873 p<0.001). Slower 1.5-mile run times were associated with higher injury occurrence (χ 2 (1)=59.3 p<0.001) and reduced phase 1 ( χ 2 104.609 a p<0.001) and 2 (χ 2 84.978 a p<0.001) success. Conclusion The 1.5-mile run can be used to guide a future standard that will in turn help reduce injury occurrence and improve training success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. Hall (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: