Design
Review
Human evidence prioritizes delayed healing and neoatherosclerosis in ISR/ST; leaves open targeted interventions.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treats focal coronary obstruction by compressing plaque, injuring the vessel wall and placing a metallic or bioresorbable scaffold. Most treated segments heal, but a small minority enter a prolonged, excessive or unstable repair state that contributes to in-stent restenosis (ISR), in-stent neoatherosclerosis and stent thrombosis (ST). Human evidence is strongest for delayed healing, uncovered struts, macrophage-rich neoatherosclerosis and hypersensitivity-associated late thrombosis, whereas routine immune biomarker-guided care remains unsupported. The narrowed lumen is only the visible endpoint; beneath it sits vascular repair shaped by de-vice-material exposure, local haemodynamics and host immunity. Endothelial denuda-tion and platelet activation initiate fibrin deposition, complement signalling and dam-age-associated molecular-pattern (DAMP) release. Neutrophils, monocytes and macro-phages dominate early, followed by lymphocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells that remodel the repair compartment. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have markedly reduced early neointimal hyperplasia, yet selected late failures still involve delayed endothelial recovery, chronic peristrut inflammation, hypersensitivity and neoatherosclerotic transformation. Immune biology is useful at the bedside only when interpreted with procedural context, device design and patient phenotype. Imaging-defined endpoints and paired immune phenotyping are therefore needed to guide treatment by mechanism instead of angiography or isolated biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyriakou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: