Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Few observations have been made of atmospheric absorption across the far infra‐red. Yet water vapour absorption in this spectral region may significantly effect climate. The impact of far infra‐red absorption is assessed by calculating the spectral variation of the total and water vapour greenhouse effects, for the sub‐arctic winter (SAW) and tropical (TRP) standard atmospheres. Although the calculated efficiency of greenhouse trapping peaks outside of the far infra‐red, the low strength there of the Planck function causes relatively small absolute forcings, except in the carbon dioxide and ozone bands. The sensitivity of the normalised greenhouse effect to water vapour concentration is largest in the far infra‐red for the SAW atmosphere, and in the window region for the TRP. The sensitivity differs most between the two atmospheres in the far infra‐red. Maximum water vapour greenhouse trapping arises in the far infra‐red, over the middle/upper troposphere; in the SAW case the contribution from the water vapour continuum is virtually eliminated. Improved spectral observations and simulations at far infra‐red wavelengths thus appear necessary to better understand the contemporary greenhouse effect, and to validate models of climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinha et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: