AIM: Japan lacks a validated tool to measure everyday ageism, leaving its prevalence and health impact unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate the Japanese version of the Everyday Ageism Scale (EAS-J) in older adults. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods design comprising forward and back translation, cognitive interviews, and a nationwide cross-sectional online survey of 1500 adults ages 60-79 years. In September 2025, participants were recruited from an online panel using quota sampling to reflect national demographic distributions. We evaluated psychometric properties using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability coefficients, and validity indices. A Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes model was used to assess associations with loneliness, stress, well-being, self-esteem, and happiness. RESULTS: The EAS-J demonstrated a three-factor structure-exposure to ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. Model fit was good on three of the four indices (comparative fit index = 0.971, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.959, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.075, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.037). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α = 0.83), test-retest reliability was moderate (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.66), and convergent and discriminant validity were supported. The scale showed significant associations with perceived stress, loneliness, well-being, and self-esteem, supporting nomological validity. CONCLUSIONS: The EAS-J is a psychometrically supported, multidimensional instrument for measuring everyday ageism among older adults in Japan. Availability of the EAS-J will facilitate research on the prevalence and health consequences of everyday ageism and inform development of interventions to promote healthy aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawaguchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: