Computational modeling study reveals misalignment among electricity market actors during thermal demand response, indicating that centralized models overestimate system-wide value.
Demand response (DR) is envisaged to be of significance for enhancing the flexibility of power systems. The distributed nature of residential demand-side resources necessitates the introduction of an aggregator/retailer to represent the flexible demand in the electricity market. However, the objectives of the residential consumers, the retailer, and the system operator might not be aligned. This paper presents a multi-perspective model which integrates the optimization problems of these strategic decision makers within a single framework for evaluation of residential thermal DR. The multi-perspective model is formulated as a bilevel optimization problem and incorporates detailed building state-space models of residential thermal demand. Comparison of the multi-perspective model with existing market-based models shows that it is able to provide a holistic view of residential DR by capturing the interactions in both the retail and wholesale markets. The results also show that centralized optimization models would over-estimate the system value of DR in the presence of strategic market participants. Detailed sensitivity analyses using the multi-perspective model reveal interesting insights on the welfare distribution aspects of DR. The results show that in addition to consumers’ flexibility, retail contract design will also play a major role in determining the welfare distribution among the involved entities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anwar et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: