Key result
Pravastatin fails to reduce delivery with preeclampsia versus placebo in high-risk women.
Why the study?
Effective screening for term preeclampsia exists at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation, but there is no known intervention to reduce the incidence of the disease.
Does pravastatin reduce delivery with preeclampsia in women with singleton pregnancies at high risk of term preeclampsia?
RCT (n=1,120)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does pravastatin reduce delivery with preeclampsia in women with singleton pregnancies at high risk of term preeclampsia?
Hazard Ratio: 1.08 (95% CI 0.78–1.49)
Absolute Event Rate: 14.6% vs 13.6%
p-value: p=0.65
Pravastatin 20 mg/d initiated at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation does not reduce the incidence of delivery with preeclampsia in high-risk women.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“It is possible that considerably higher doses and longer duration of treatment with pravastatin are needed to restore the balance in the circulating levels of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factor and thereby prevent the development of preeclampsia.”
“Prophylactic administration of pravastatin in late pregnancy in women at high risk for preeclampsia is not useful in the prevention of preeclampsia.”
Pravastatin does not prevent term preeclampsia in screened high-risk women; leaves open the need for other late-pregnancy interventions.
Background: Effective screening for term preeclampsia is provided by a combination of maternal factors with measurements of mean arterial pressure, serum placental growth factor, and serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation, with a detection rate of ≈75% at a screen-positive rate of 10%. However, there is no known intervention to reduce the incidence of the disease. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 1120 women with singleton pregnancies at high risk of term preeclampsia to receive pravastatin at a dose of 20 mg/d or placebo from 35 to 37 weeks of gestation until delivery or 41 weeks. The primary outcome was delivery with preeclampsia at any time after randomization. The analysis was performed according to intention to treat. Results: A total of 29 women withdrew consent during the trial. Preeclampsia occurred in 14.6% (80 of 548) of participants in the pravastatin group and in 13.6% (74 of 543) in the placebo group. Allowing for the effect of risk at the time of screening and participating center, the mixed-effects Cox regression showed no evidence of an effect of pravastatin (hazard ratio for statin/placebo, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.78–1.49]; P =0.65). There was no evidence of interaction between the effect of pravastatin, estimated risk of preeclampsia, pregnancy history, adherence, and aspirin treatment. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of any secondary outcomes, including gestational hypertension, stillbirth, abruption, delivery of small for gestational age neonates, neonatal death, or neonatal morbidity. There was no significant between-group difference in the treatment effects on serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentrations 1 and 3 weeks after randomization. Adherence was good, with reported intake of ≥80% of the required number of tablets in 89% of participants. There were no significant between-group differences in neonatal adverse outcomes or other adverse events. Conclusions: Pravastatin in women at high risk of term preeclampsia did not reduce the incidence of delivery with preeclampsia. Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com ; Unique identifier ISRCTN16123934.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Döbert et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Term preeclampsia (n=1,120). Pravastatin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Delivery with preeclampsia at any time after randomization (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.78-1.49, p=0.65). Pravastatin did not reduce the incidence of delivery with preeclampsia compared to placebo in women at high risk of term preeclampsia (14.6% vs 13.6%; HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.78-1.49; P=0.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: