Provides the first evidence for two distinct angiotensin II receptor subtypes with differing biochemical features and mechanisms of action in rat liver.
Distinguishes two Ang II receptor subtypes with separate signaling in rat liver; leaves open their roles and relevance in human cardiovascular disease.
Radioligand binding studies identified two classes of 125I-angiotensin II-binding sites in rat liver membranes. High affinity binding sites (Kd = 0.35 +/- 0.13 nM, N = 372 +/- 69 fmol/mg of protein) were inactivated by dithiothreitol (0.1-10 mM) without any apparent change in low affinity binding sites (Kd = 3.1 +/- 0.8 nM, N = 658 +/- 112 fmol/mg of protein). Dithiothreitol inactivation was readily reversible but could be made permanent by alkylation of membrane proteins with iodoacetamide. Angiotensin II stimulation of glycogen phosphorylase in isolated rat hepatocytes (maximal stimulation 780%, EC50 = 0.4 nM) was completely inhibited by 10 mM dithiothreitol, a concentration which also abolished high affinity site binding; phosphorylase stimulation by glucagon and norepinephrine under these conditions was unaltered. Angiotensin II inhibition of glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in hepatocytes required higher angiotensin II concentrations (EC50 = 3 nM) than phosphorylase stimulation and was not affected by dithiothreitol. Fractional occupancy of high affinity binding sites by 125I-angiotensin II correlated closely with angiotensin II-mediated phosphorylase stimulation, whereas occupancy of low affinity sites paralleled inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity. These data indicate that the physiologic effects of angiotensin II in rat liver are mediated by two distinct receptors, apparently not interconvertible, and provide the first evidence for angiotensin II receptor subtypes with differing biochemical features and mechanisms of action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Gunther (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: