Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present comprehensive results from constant NVT and constant NPT Monte Carlo simulations of particles interacting via a biaxial variant of the Gay–Berne potential which we term the Internally Rotated Gay–Berne (IRGB) potential. The IRGB potential may be considered to be a single-site approximation to the interaction between two zig–zag shaped molecules, the extent of this molecular biaxiality being characterized by an internal rotation angle δ. We find that increasing the value of δ frustrates the formation of orientationally ordered phases, all phase transitions being shifted to lower temperatures and higher densities. Additionally, for δ⩾30 degrees, the smectic B phase is replaced by the tilted smectic J phase. The smectic A phase, in contrast, is destabilized completely for sufficiently large δ, with neither smectic A nor its tilted equivalent, smectic C, being observed. This suggests that models for smectic C-formation which are based on biaxial intermolecular attractions may not offer the best route to obtaining this phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Withers et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: