We report the methanol synthesis from CO 2 and H 2 on metal (M = K, Ti, Co, Rh, Ni, and Cu)-modified model Mo 6 S 8 catalyst using density functional theory (DFT). The results show that the catalytic behavior of a Mo 6 S 8 cluster is changed significantly due to the modifiers, via the electron transfer from M to Mo 6 S 8 and therefore the reduction of the Mo cation (ligand effect) and the direct participation of M in the reaction (ensemble effect) to promote some elementary steps. With the most positively charged modifier, the ligand effect in the case of K–Mo 6 S 8 is the most obvious among the systems studied; however, it cannot compete with the ensemble effect, which plays a dominate role in determining activity via the electrostatic attraction in particular to stabilize the CH x O y species adsorbed at the Mo sites of Mo 6 S 8 . In comparison, the ligand effect is weaker and the ensemble effect is more important when the other modifiers are used. In addition, the modifiers also vary the optimal reaction pathway for methanol synthesis on Mo 6 S 8, ranging from the reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) + CO hydrogenation as that of Mo 6 S 8 to the formate pathway. Finally, K is able to accelerate the methanol synthesis on Mo 6 S 8 the most, whereas the promotion by Rh is relatively small. Using the modifiers like Ti, Co, Ni, and Cu, the activity of Mo 6 S 8 is decreased instead. The relative stability between *HCOO and *HOCO is identified as a descriptor to capture the variation in mechanism and scales well with the estimated activity. Our study not only provides better understanding of the reaction mechanism and actives on the modified Mo 6 S 8 but also predicts some possible candidates, which can be used as a promoter to facilitate the CH 3 OH synthesis on Mo sulfides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: