Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of intravitreal injection (IVI) of dexamethasone implant as second-line treatment in patients with resistant chronic diabetic macular edema nonresponsive to 6 monthly consecutive IVI of ranibizumab. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted over 9 months. Best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were noted. Patients with best-corrected visual acuity ≤20/40 using Snellen chart, central macular thickness ≥300 μm, and poor response to 6 monthly consecutive IVI of ranibizumab were included. Patients received IVI of dexamethasone implant and were examined at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. RESULTS: Thirteen eyes of 12 patients were included (6 men and 6 women; mean age, 64 ± 7.8 years). Best-corrected visual acuity increased by a mean of 5.58 letters at Month 1 (P = 0.017), 4.61 at Month 3 (P = 0.05), 4.61 at Month 6 (P = 0.042), and 5.77 at Month 9 (P = 0.017). Central macular thickness decreased from 594 μm to 402 μm at Month 1 (P = 0.0002), 428 μm at Month 3 (P = 0.002), 459 μm at Month 6 (P = 0.02), and 489 μm at Month 9 (P = 0.03). Mean number of dexamethasone IVI was 1.07. Two patients (15.3%) developed elevated intraocular pressure, and 1 patient was operated for cataract at 6 months (9% of phakic patients). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant seems as an effective second-line treatment in diabetic macular edema persistent after 6 monthly consecutive intravitreal ranibizumab injections in real life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braham et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: