Why the study?
Recurrent pericarditis substantially impairs quality of life, and safety is a major issue with current medical treatments as it often affects relatively young or middle-aged patients.
What are the efficacy and safety considerations of current medical therapies for recurrent pericarditis?
What are the efficacy and safety considerations of current medical therapies for recurrent pericarditis?
This review highlights the shift towards personalized, phenotype-driven treatment for recurrent pericarditis, emphasizing anti-IL-1 agents for inflammatory presentations.
Safety concerns with recurrent pericarditis therapies remain incompletely defined; leaves open need for dedicated long-term safety studies.
INTRODUCTION: Recurrent pericarditis is one of the most troublesome complications of pericarditis affecting a substantial amount of patients and often severely impairing the quality of life. Current medical treatments range from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, and corticosteroids to biological agents (anti IL-1 agents, especially anakinra and rilonacept), intravenous immunoglobulins and immunosuppressive treatments. Safety is a major issue to deal with since the disease often affects relatively young or middle-aged patients. AREAS COVERED: The review is aimed at providing an update on the efficacy and safety of current medical therapies for recurrent pericarditis including most recent advances represented by anti IL-1 agents. EXPERT OPINION: Therapy of recurrent pericarditis has evolved over years leading to a more evidence-based and personalized treatment based on clinical presentation and pathophysiology. The main distinction is between patients with an inflammatory phenotype (e.g. fever, elevation of markers of inflammation, pericardial, and/or pleural effusion) vs. those without an inflammatory phenotype. Colchicine and anti IL-1 agents are especially efficacious and indicated for those with an inflammatory phenotype, while corticosteroids, azathioprine, and immunoglobulins seem more indicated for those without evidence of systemic inflammation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massimo Imazio (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: