Eighty Angus x Hereford steers (average initial weight 287 kg) were used in a 168-d finishing study to evaluate the effects of barley variety on feedlot performance, diet digestion, and carcass characteristics. The four treatments compared in this completely randomized design (four pens/ treatment) were high-concentrate diets based on 1) corn, 2) Gunhilde barley (GUN), 3) Harrington barley (HAR), or 4) Medallion barley (MED). Steers consuming corn gained 10% faster (P < .01) than steers fed HAR, and HAR resulted in 8% faster (P < .01) gains than GUN or MED. Dry matter intake was greater (P < .01) for steers fed corn than for steers fed GUN, HAR, or MED, and HAR-fed steers consumed more than MED-fed steers. Efficiency (kilograms of gain/100 kg of feed) was higher (P < .05) for steers fed GUN, HAR, and MED than for corn-fed steers. Estimated NEm and NEg of barley varieties ranged from 2.32 to 2.51 Mcal of NEm/kg and 1.61 and 1.77 Mcal of NEg/kg. Carcass weight was greater (P < .01) for steers fed corn rather than HAR and greater (P < .01) for HAR-fed steers than for those fed GUN or MED. Quality grade was higher (P < .05) for HAR-fed steers than for steers fed corn, GUN, or MED. Steers fed corn had the highest (P < .01) digestible starch intake, followed by steers fed HAR, GUN, and, finally, MED, the same approximate ranking as for ADG. A diet based on Harrington barley resulted in greater DMI, ADG, and carcass quality grade compared with diets based on Gunhilde or Medallion barleys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boss et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: