This article provides a historical account of the American-supported ‘counterinsurgency’ campaign in Guatemala in the 1960s. The analysis of a selection of now-declassified secret documents and of a number of public testimonies given by representatives of the executive branch before the US Congress reveals the existence of two very different discourses on ‘counterinsurgency’ and ‘terrorism’. A focus on the profound differences between these public and secret discourses, it is argued, allows for a powerful critique of government-sponsored projects that, from Camelot in 1965 to the Human Terrain System programme launched in the mid-2000s, have attempted to harness the expertise of social scientists in the service of often extraordinarily brutal US ‘counterinsurgency’ campaigns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rémi Brulin (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: