AIM: This experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that the plasma volume is not selectively defended during exercise- and heat-induced dehydration following humid-heat acclimation. METHODS: Eight physically active males were heat acclimated (39.8 °C, relative humidity 59.2%) using 17 days of controlled hyperthermia (core temperature: 38.5 °C). Inter-compartmental fluid losses and movements were tracked (radioisotopes and Evans blue dye) during progressive dehydration (cycling) in these same conditions and also during a resting recovery without fluid replacement (28 °C), before (day 1), during (day 8) and after heat acclimation (day 22). RESULTS: On days 8 and 22, there were significant increases in total body water, interstitial fluid and plasma volume (P < 0.05), but the intracellular compartments did not change (P > 0.05). The baseline plasma volume remained expanded throughout: 43.4 [±2.6 (day 1)], 49.1 [±2.4 (day 8); P < 0.05] and 48.9 mL kg(-1) [±3.0 (day 22); P < 0.05]. During progressive dehydration, plasma reductions of 9.0% (±0.9: day 1), 12.4% (±1.6: day 8) and 13.6% (±1.2: day 22) were observed, with day 8 and 22 losses significantly exceeding day 1 (P < 0.05). During recovery, plasma volume restoration commenced, with the intracellular fluid contribution becoming more pronounced as acclimation progressed. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the plasma volume was not defended more vigorously following humid-heat acclimation. Indeed, a greater fluid loss may well underlie the mechanisms for enhancing plasma volume recovery when heat acclimation is induced using the controlled-hyperthermia technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patterson et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: