Adoption of variable‐rate N management by North American corn ( Zea mays L.) producers is low, despite the potential economic and environmental benefits of this practice. A major obstacle is that recommended N fertilizer rates based on yield goal are often poorly correlated with actual economically optimum N rates. Nitrogen response patterns are often field‐ and season‐specific and can vary widely within the same field, further complicating adoption. Side‐by‐side comparisons of uniform‐ and variable‐rate N management have revealed no consistent advantages for either strategy in yields achieved, profitability, whole‐field N usage, or N‐use efficiency by plants. In the future, a better understanding of temporal variation in N soil test levels, better crop simulation models, and improved N sensing and application equipment may assist growers in capturing the benefits of site‐specific N management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas A. Doerge (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: